In order
for us to understand what public policy might actually help improve cities with
a large homeless population, then we need to understand what assumptions public
policy makers might have about the homeless which work against public interest.
Much
of homelessness policy has revolved around finding a single solution to
homelessness. However, the solution to
homelessness must be as complex as homeless people themselves. A single solution always leaves many homeless
people out of the public equation.
Giving the homeless apartments doesn’t meet the need of those who have
claustrophobia, or PTSD for being around groups of people (although it does
give them a place to securely store their belongings). Tiny houses is a more expensive solution that
doesn’t work for the homeless that gather large quantities of items in order to
provide security in their lives. Job training
works for those ready to leap into a job, which is not the majority of chronic
homeless. Criminalizing homeless
activity is not only unconstitutional, but it doesn’t give the homeless any
incentive to solve their own issues.
Any
solution must be a multifaceted solution, there is no one answer.
No comments:
Post a Comment