In order
for us to understand what public policy might actually help improve cities with
a large homeless population, then we need to understand what assumptions public
policy makers might have about the homeless which work against public interest.
Many public policy makers assume
that all of the homeless want or need an apartment, which is the current fad
among homeless policy makers. Wet
apartments* is a solution for some, but it seems to not actually reduce
homelessness, at least in Multnomah County, and it creates a mini-slum around
the housing. To speak to most homeless
as to what they want, their solutions are twofold: to have a place where they
can sleep without being harassed, and to have a secure place where they can
leave their belongings.
Although these
solutions are temporary, they are far less complicated and far less expensive
than what public policy makers want to give.
This is partly because the policy makers have more than one goal—helping
the homeless isn’t the only issue—but it is also because they assume that the
homeless want or need much more than they do.
*Housing for the addicted without needing them to be clean or sober.
No comments:
Post a Comment